A Stitch in Haste

A Stitch in Time Saves Nine...But Haste Makes Waste

A collection of real-world libertarian, individualist and laissez-faire rants on law, economics, politics, culture and other current events
by an average, everyday lawyer & investment banker and part-time pop scholar.

The Princes of Jesusland
Let's check in on some of the Red State Rednecks' favorite elected representatives.

ITEM: I am of course late to the party regarding the recent developments concerning Senator George "Macaca" Allen. But as John Kerry might say, I was early before I was late, so cut me some slack.

On the question of how he could not have known, or even suspected, that he might have Jewish ancestors, even though he repeatedly noted that his grandfather was sent to a Nazi concentration camp: Talk about "not connecting the dots." As for the question of whether his ancestry matters: of course it does, for a very simple reason. Allen has, throughout his political career, worn his Christianity on his sleeve, and has pandered, relentlessly, to the evangelical Christian (i.e., Jesusland) base. And given the Jesuslanders' penchant for playing fast and loose on "the Jewish question" — what I have called the "Judeo-Gotcha" — the topic is unquestionably fair game, as is Allen's truthfulness on this (or any other subject).

On the accusations that he used racial epithets in his youth, and the counter-accusations that he is being "Swiftboated": the credibility of witnesses is a question to be left to the triers of fact (i.e., you and me). Allen has cause to lie, and a circumstantial record of having appeared to have lied in the past. These former teammates are not "partisan political operatives" (remember that term?) and are respected professionals. Others, meanwhile, have stepped up to defend Allen. We report, you decide.

This much is certain: Allen will either win or lose re-election to the Senate this November. But it is unequivocal that he is no longer a viable presidential candidate in 2008. "Long live the prince, the prince is dead!"

More thoughts from Pam's House Blend.

---

ITEM: Now that Allen is damaged goods, the Jesuslanders need a new princely heir --
The question hung in the air of this past weekend's Family Research Council summit in Washington: Who will that candidate be for the GOP's powerful social conservative base?
...
Surprisingly, it was Massachusetts' Gov. Mitt Romney, a Mormon with a Harvard M.B.A who governs the nation's most liberal state. The 1,800 delegates applauded him frequently during his Friday speech and gave him a standing ovation afterward. Mr. Romney detailed his efforts to block court-imposed same-sex marriage in the Bay State and noted that the liberal Legislature has failed to place a citizen-initiated referendum on the ballot. He excoriated liberals for supporting democracy only when they think that the outcome is a foregone conclusion that favors their views. He certainly picked up fans at the summit. "I believe Mitt Romney may be the only hope social conservatives have in 2008," says Maggie Gallagher, author of a book defending traditional marriage.
Of course, the fascinating thing about Romney's appeal to the Jesuslanders is that he is not one of them — he's a Mormon. To the evangelicals, Mormons are a lot like Jews — in public, the Christians treat these "not quite Christians" as just another voice in the church choir. But in private, amongst themselves, it's "All Jesus All the Time" — Moses and Moroni are simply not part of the equation; they merely get paid some occasional lip service each election season.

In any case, if no less noteworthy a Jesuslander than professional bigot Maggie Gallagher concludes that a Mormon is "the only hope" for social conservatives, then that invites the question: are there no candidates to defend "traditional Christian values" who are, um, traditional Christians? This is somehow indicative of a movement that is supposedly "showing momentum"? Go figure.

POST SCRIPT: Incidentally, Romney is pro-choice. Even more evidence of how pathetic the Jesuslanders must be if he's the best they can come up with.

---

ITEM: Going back to the November elections, it looks increasingly certain that Pennsylvania Senator Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum is headed toward a clear and perhaps humiliating defeat. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving bigot.

Still, Santorum — the number three leader of Senate Republicans — is simply too useful in Jesusland politics to go quietly into the night. I rarely make political predictions (and when I do, I am never right), but I would not be surprised if, once his term expires, a high-profile Cabinet position promptly became available for Santorum. Or, going out on a limb, we might see Bush and Rove oust party leader "Closet Ken" Mehlman so Santorum could become RNC Chairman.

Rick Santorum versus Howard Dean — that could make a libertarian's head explode.

---

ITEM: Let's end with a little humor. A forthcoming Comedy Central animated series, "Freak Show," will feature bizarre and dysfunctional deviants and mutants as bumbling superheroes. I would not normally watch such a show, but given that one of the freaks is "Log Cabin Republican" — a spindly suit-and-tie type who morphs into a Hulk/Thing-styled alter-ego named "Burly Bear" — I may have to give the show a screening.
Posted by Kip on 27 September 2006.
Linkfest: Special "Pity the Bigots" Edition
Not a good week for the Princes of Jesusland:

ITEM: I said from the outset that outgoing Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was simply not a viable inheritor of the social conservative mantle, for the simple reason that evangelical Christians don't really like Mormons — who, as with Jews, are only "sorta kinda" like them at best. Vicious anti-gay bigotry by Romney would simply not overcome that.

Especially when the vicious anti-gay bigotry is sheer politics-as-usual hypocrisy:
Romney is facing new questions about his beliefs on gay issues after the emergence of a letter he wrote during his 1994 U.S. Senate run, in which he promised to be a stronger advocate for gays than Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.
...
Citing Kennedy's record of advocacy for gays and lesbians, Romney wrote: "For some voters, it might be enough to simply match my opponent's record in this area. But I believe we can and must do better. If we are to achieve the goals we share, we must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern. My opponent cannot do this. I can and will."
The "true" Christians (i.e., those not in the Mormon "cult" as they call it) are, to put it mildly, displeased.

Coupled with Romney's earlier flip-flop on abortion, his presidential campaign will certainly be aborted (pun intended) quite soon.

More thoughts from PHB (times two), Outright Libertarians, Straight Not Narrow.

---

ITEM: (Now former) Virginia Senator George Allen is whining that his defeat was unfairly due to "distractions" —
As Allen campaigned unsuccessfully for a second term in the U.S. Senate, the distractions formed a dark, unattractive narrative of his life that he said crowded out everything else he was trying to say. "You have these cheap shots coming at you, but you still need to move forward," Allen said[.]
Cry me a river. What, exactly, was distorted, by James Webb or anyone else, about Allen's record or behavior? Nothing. Good bye and, let us hope, good riddance.

---

ITEM: The last bigot standing, Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas, who having shot himself in the foot with his neanderthal block of a judicial nominee for — gasp! — having attended a private and symbolic commitment ceremony for two lesbians, is now sticking the gun in his mouth
Brownback ... said Friday he would lift his hold on a federal judicial nominee if she agrees to step aside from any case dealing with same-sex unions.
...
Brownback, a prominent gay marriage opponent, says he is concerned the incident colors her legal view on the constitutionality of allowing same-sex marriages.
It's quite simple really. The term is "advice and consent," not "advice and blackmail." The idea that a Senator — one out of one hundred — could extort (there is no other word for it) an agreement by a judicial nominee to recuse herself from future cases, not due to any cognizable conflict of interest, is not only morally despicable, it is per se misconduct and arguably grounds for expulsion from the Senate. It is malfeasance of the highest order, no different in principle from taking a bribe. Brownback's actions are so toxic that he contaminates all three branches of government with one asinine tantrum.

And this wretched creature is now the leading Prince of Jesusland in the Senate? As another conservative bigot might say, perhaps we are seeing the last throes of the social conservative movement.

More thoughts from PurpleScarf.

(Incidentally, two Senate Democrats are, rightly or wrongly, retaliating for Brownback's misconduct by blocking other judicial nominees in a brazen tit-for-tat. Splendid. Yet another example of "The World's Greatest Deliberative Body" in action.)

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Trick Question of the Day
  2. Linkfest: Special "Pity the Bigots" Edition
  3. The Princes of Jesusland
Posted by Kip on 11 December 2006.
Trick Question of the Day
Q: What do these three men have in common?

--George W. Bush

--Sam Brownback

--Rick Santorum

A: They are all "defenders of religious freedom" —
President George W. Bush received a Southern Baptist award for his advocacy of religious freedom in a Jan. 29 presentation at the White House.
...
"I can't think of another president in my lifetime who has done more to promote religious liberty specifically as a fundamental human right around the world than" Bush, [Richard Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission] told Baptist Press.
...
The ERLC's trustees voted in September to give the 2006 award to Bush. Previous recipients have included U.S. Sens. Sam Brownback and Rick Santorum[.]
Usually it's Bush giving away the Orwellian "heckuva job" awards and medals to his flunked-out flunkies. How fitting that he should receive his own Bizarro-world "black-is-white, failure-is-success, theocracy-is-religious-freedom" award.

I wonder how many Jews, or Muslims, or Mormons, or Buddhists have ever received this award. I wonder if Jimmy Carter, a (former) Southern Baptist who despite his innumerable other defects was never a theocrat, ever won the award.

More generally, how many winners of this gobbeldygook award, or for that matter how many Southern Baptists — among the most intolerant of Christian sects — recognize that "freedom of religious" requires "freedom from religion"?

That, unfortunately, is anything but a trick question.

(Via Wall of Separation.)

---

The award is named after John Leland (1754-1841), a Massachusetts minister who personally preached to President Thomas Jefferson during a visit to Washington. A quick quote:
The notion of a Christian commonwealth should be exploded forever ... Government should protect every man in thinking and speaking freely, and see that one does not abuse another. The liberty I contend for is more than toleration. The very idea of toleration is despicable; it supposes that some have a pre-eminence above the rest to grant indulgence, whereas all should be equally free, Jews, Turks, Pagans and Christians.
If there is a Heaven, then he is there, and he is weeping over the bigotry of his successor Baptists.
Posted by Kip on 4 February 2007.