Some Subway Fare Good News / Bad News
---
The good news is that subway fares might not rise as is currently planned:
Here's a radical idea: the people who ride the subway should, um, pay for it. Not the people who buy and sell property.
---
Speaking of the subway and money, here's one just for flavor:
"We don't want to do it," [MTA Executive Director Katherine] Lapp said of the expected hikes in 2007 and 2009 during testimony before a state legislative budget committee in Albany yesterday. "It's the last resource that we look to to close the budget."The bad news:
Should revenue exceed what the MTA is projecting, particularly in the area of real-estate-transaction tax receipts, a fare hike may be avoidable, Lapp said.Which invites the question of why "real-estate-transaction tax receipts" should be used to finance the MTA at all.
Here's a radical idea: the people who ride the subway should, um, pay for it. Not the people who buy and sell property.
---
Speaking of the subway and money, here's one just for flavor:
A ride home on the F train doubled the cost of Samantha Hoover's groceries -- after a cop wrote her a $50 ticket for putting the plastic bag on the seat next to her.Well, that's one way to keep fares down.
...
"Next thing I know, a police officer walks up and wants to know if I've ever been arrested," said Hoover. "He asked for my identification and said, 'You can't put your bag there.' "
Hoover's life as an outlaw was made possible by new MTA subway rules -- prohibiting activities such as roller-skating or walking between cars, not to mention putting bags on seats.
Related Posts (on one page):
- Should Tolls Rise With Incomes?
- Some Subway Fare Good News / Bad News
- On NYC's Subway Pricing Chaos
- Next Stop -- Singapore?
- Should Subways Charge Peak & Off-Peak Fares?
Posted by Kip on
1 February 2006
To comment on this post, please visit the new blogsite.



