How Best to Deter Municipal Corruption?
---
Philadelphia voters are deciding today whether to impose campaign finance limits (i.e., restrictions on freedom of speech) in order to prevent corruption and influence peddling in the awarding of municipal contracts:
But I guess that would have been too easy.
An individual would be barred from getting a no-bid contract worth more than $10,000 if the person had given more than $2,500 per year to the campaign of a city official. Companies seeking city contracts would be barred from giving more than $5,000 per year.Of course, an alternative might have been simply to abolish no-bid contracts worth more than $10,000. That way the city would not only curb corruption but might also actually save money through competition.
But I guess that would have been too easy.
Related Posts (on one page):
- Supreme Court Chips Away at McCain-Feingold
- Like Taking Campaign Candy From a Baby
- Supreme Court Has (Yet Another) Chance to Eradicate McCain-Feingold
- First Amendment Loses Another Campaign Finance Skirmish
- Lamont-Lieberman and McCain-Feingold
- Campaign Finance Reform is Dead -- Long Live Campaign Finance Reform!
- How Best to Deter Municipal Corruption?
- Supreme Court to Revisit Campaign Contribution Limits
- Regulation of Political Blogs Back in the News
Posted by Kip on
8 November 2005
To comment on this post, please visit the new blogsite.



