To review, an NSL is simply a demand by the government for information. Which, in a sane world still governed by the Fourth Amendment, would require a warrant issued by a judge based upon probable cause. But this is no longer a sane world governed by the Fourth Amendment. Not only is no warrant needed, not only is no demonstration of probable cause needed, but the entire process is kept completely secret, supposedly justified by "national security" (hence the term "national security letter").
The subjects of NSLs never know that their information has been turned over to the government. What's worse, the entities ordered by the government to turn over information are not even allowed to disclose that fact. The suppression of disclosure is so thorough that even the pleadings in lawsuits challenging NSLs must be redacted to conceal the institutions' identities (it is generally believed that the plaintiffs in the most publicized litigation are university libraries that are challenging NSLs for foreign students' checkout records).
Now comes word that the use of NSLs, which the government initially assured the public would be sparingly if ever used, has reached epidemic proportions:
The FBI now issues more than 30,000 national security letters a year, according to government sources, a hundredfold increase over historic norms. The letters — one of which can be used to sweep up the records of many people — are extending the bureau's reach as never before into the telephone calls, correspondence and financial lives of ordinary Americans.Perhaps I'm too cynical, but I have no doubt that the reason the government has not offered any example of an NSL actually stopping a terrorist is because it has never happened.
...
The Bush administration defeated legislation and a lawsuit to require a public accounting, and has offered no example in which the use of a national security letter helped disrupt a terrorist plot.
But wait, there's more:
In late 2003, the Bush administration reversed a long-standing policy requiring agents to destroy their files on innocent American citizens, companies and residents when investigations closed. Late last month, President Bush signed Executive Order 13388, expanding access to those files for "state, local and tribal" governments and for "appropriate private sector entities," which are not defined.So now not only is the Fourth Amendment optional, but so too is the notion that private information seized in named of "national security" should be shared within government on a "need to know" basis only. Heck, give it to states, to Indian tribes, to Halliburton — the more the merrier.
Someone has to start standing athwart all this yelling "Stop!" Again, in a sane world that would be the responsibiility of the courts. But even they're cowering in the face of the PATRIOT Act and deferring to "the experts" in deciding just how far the War on Terror will overlap the War on Privacy.
To the extent the goal of the terrorists is "to destroy the American way of life," they are succeeding — with the help of the PATRIOT Act, the FBI, the White House, and the spineless courts.
Hopefully the current NSL cases in Connecticut and the Second Circuit will be the beginning of the end of NSL abuse, and perhaps of the PATRIOT Act itself.
More thoughts at Crime & Federalism, Hammer of Truth, LP Blog.
(And remember: The fact that you have read this blogpost may end up in a government database somewhere. Have a nice day.)
Related Posts (on one page):
- Is There Anyone Who Isn't Spying On Us?
- PATRIOT Act: 30,000 NSLs Per Year and Counting
- PATRIOT Act: When "Paranoia" Becomes Prescience
Feel free to post as a Guest. You do not need to provide a valid email address. Comments are open for fourteen days only. All comments are subject to editing or deletion. There is a 2000-character limit for comments; lengthy multi-part comments are NOT permitted; you should email me such responses instead. Please note that time constraints preclude me from replying to most comments, although I do try to reply to all emails.















but the war in iraq and afghanistan are defending democracy abroad while patriot act is abandoning it at home this lowers the bar for freedom
the usa is home of the free so if freedom is lost or diminished it allows all other countries to lower standards to or below are own this is a global problem first other western contrys like britin
http://home.uni-one.nl/plein/jon/Read_more/politics.htm
in the end I dont want the us constitution or any foreign constitution to read somthing like this
all living human beens are people unless parliament rules other wise
all poeple have the freedom of speech unless other wise dictated by law all speech is protected unless other wise dictated by law
now this style of constitutional law would provide no protion are rights but the patriot act is worded no different some spots and if up held by the courts we could very well have a interpretation of the us constitution just like the sample I gave above
quotes.ibnerd.net/politicalquotes_1.html
After 9/11, Bush made two statements: “Terrorists hate America because America is a land of freedom and opportunity.” and “We intend to attack the root causes of terrorism.” ..Sounds like everything is going according to plan.