Northern (Indecent) Exposure
---
The Roman Catholic Church has found quite a convenient solution to its problem of rampant pedophile and pederast priests:
Will this be the Catholic Church's new defense in its seemingly endless child molestation scandal? "Well, when you think about it, 2.4% isn't all that bad."
Perhaps Alaska's hack politicians should spend less time building "bridges to nowhere" and more time looking out for their constituents. (See also my previous post.)
(Via Fark.)
The fourth lawsuit in less than two weeks accusing an Alaska-based Catholic priest of sexual abuse was filed Thursday, fueling a conviction among critics that Alaska was a dumping ground for problem clergy."Only" 12 out of 500? "Only" a 2.4% pervert rate? Could you imagine if "only" 2.4% of a school's teachers were child molesters, "only 2.4% of a camp's counselors were convicted sex offenders, or if "only" 2.4% of a practice's dentists fondled their anesthetized patients' breasts?
...
Rural Alaska was a prime go-to place to send abusive priests, given its isolation and cultural reverence for authority figures, such as elders and priests, said Patrick Wall, a former Benedictine priest and consultant for a Costa Mesa, Calif., law firm that has worked on more than 300 church abuse allegations nationwide, including Alaska.
...
Even though only [sic] 12 of Alaska's 500 priests who served between 1959 and 2002 face allegations -- a fraction of nearly 4,400 priests accused nationwide -- people like Wall say the spate of allegations has only begun.
Will this be the Catholic Church's new defense in its seemingly endless child molestation scandal? "Well, when you think about it, 2.4% isn't all that bad."
Perhaps Alaska's hack politicians should spend less time building "bridges to nowhere" and more time looking out for their constituents. (See also my previous post.)
(Via Fark.)
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
Posted by KipEsquire on
21 October 2005
To comment on this post, please visit the new blogsite.



