Breaking: Supreme Court Won't Re-Hear Kelo
---
As I predicted, the Supreme Court won't revisit its disgraceful decision in the eminent domain case, Kelo v. New London, No. 04-108 (2005):
Right?
Stevens said that "the public outcry that greeted (the ruling) is some evidence that the political process is up to the task of addressing such policy concerns."And if a few, or a few thousand, homeowners lose their property in the process, so what? A little constitutional collateral damage is no big deal, so long as "the political process" is alive and kicking, right?
Right?
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Words of "Wisdom" from the USA Today School of Law
- Maybe They Can Give It to Pfizer
- House Passes "No Federal Funding" Eminent Domain Bill...
- The "Anti-Kelo" Kelo Case
- Breaking: Supreme Court Won't Re-Hear Kelo
- If The Law Supposes That......
- Congress to the Rescue on Kelo?
- An Appropriate Post-Kelo Case
- The Slaughter-Rights Cases
Posted by KipEsquire on
22 August 2005
To comment on this post, please visit the new blogsite.
